Qualitative
Inquiries in Music Therapy
Abrams, B. (Ed.)(2004). Qualitative Inquiries in Music Therapy,
Volume 1. Gilsum, NH: Barcelona Publishers.
Meadows, A. (Ed.)(2005). Qualitative Inquiries in Music Therapy,
Volume 2. Gilsum, NH: Barcelona Publishers.
Reviewed by Douglas Keith, Ph.D., MT-BC, Georgia College & State
University, Milledgeville, Georgia, USA.
With its new monograph series, Qualitative Inquiries in
Music Therapy (QIMT), Barcelona Publishers has provided
readers with
a valuable and continuing resource for music therapists,
music therapy students, and qualitative researchers in
other fields.
2004 saw the publication of the first volume, and 2005
that of Volume 2. Kenneth Bruscia, the owner of Barcelona
Publishers,
initiated this series, and its first two volumes suggest
good things to come.
The
submission guidelines for QIMT are summed up in a sentence,
which
reads "only unpublished research
studies on music therapy that are in the qualitative
paradigm will be considered
for publication." True to form, Ken Bruscia provides
definitions of each salient word or phrase in this
sentence. The editors
have ensured that the studies meet these guidelines:
none of the writings have been published before, all
are systematic
and monitored for integrity, all address music therapy
topics, and all are qualitative, though from a variety
of methodologies.
The result is a refreshing, engaging, and thought-provoking
set of readings.
Volume 1 includes an introduction by guest editor Brian
Abrams, which helpfully contextualizes the monograph.
The series is designed to provide a publication
venue for qualitative research, due to the historical intolerance of
scientific (i.e., quantitative) journals toward qualitative
research. Abrams does
not spend time defending or justifying qualitative
research. Rather, he provides a brief
overview of the studies presented in Volume 1 and concisely places
them in their historical and methodological contexts.
The
volumes in the QIMT series (so far)
contain works by more than one author; in this way it differs from
other monographs in music therapy (cf., The Nordoff-Robbins
music therapy monograph series).
All four studies included in Volume 1 utilize phenomenology
in some form, revealing the versatility of this
methodology. The topics range from the
experience of
listening to music while upset (Racette), the experience of being
effective as a music therapist (Comeau), to therapists'
experience of spiritual
moments in
music therapy (Marom). The largest study in Volume 1, a recent dissertation,
focuses on meaning in improvisational music therapy with adolescent
clients (Gardstrom). This study also incorporates
hermeneutics in its methodology.
Gardstrom's focus
on clients', rather than therapists' experiences, combined with the
more complex methodology, provides an interesting
shift of perspectives, and
also signals
to the novice reader something of the complex landscape of qualitative
research.
Volume
2 is headed by another guest editor, Anthony Meadows. His
introduction
addresses the challenge
of communicating
nonverbal experiences,
using
the metaphor of translation. This metaphor resonated with my experiences
as
a speaker of
several languages and occasional translator, as well as a qualitative
researcher, specifically
that it is often very difficult to translate ideas from one language
or mode of experience into another. Fortunately, little was lost
in the "translation" of
the studies in Volume 2.
The studies in Volume 2 employ a somewhat broader selection
of methodologies. The first study (Bruscia et al.) introduces
a new
qualitative methodology,
collaborative heuristic analysis. In the study, the researchers
essentially use each other
as research tools in all possible roles in the Bonny Method of
Guided Imagery and Music (BMGIM). Another study (Abbott) explores
positive
and negative
client experiences in BMGIM. The final study in Volume 2 (Brescia)
explores intuition
as experienced and used by music therapists. Both of these studies
are phenomenological in nature, with some epistemological differences.
Abbott
operates from the position
of transcendental realism, while Brescia describes her work more
generally, as a form of naturalistic inquiry.
In both volumes of QIMT, the researchers have included
very thorough discussions of the implications of their
studies. This is particularly
important for
studies of this size and nature, given the amount and types
of data that qualitative
studies can produce. This is evidence of quality work both
on the part of the researchers and the editorial board.
The QIMT series has several features which make it a valuable
addition to the published research in music therapy. First,
qualitative research is not set up
in competition or even in comparison to quantitative research.
This is reflected in the makeup of the editorial board, an
international group
of respected qualitative
researchers. Second, each study includes a detailed explanation
of
its methods, which is appropriate in qualitative inquiry.
This allows the
richness and variety
of qualitative methods to emerge naturally, in the context
of each
individual study. Third, the writing is very clear and engaging,
allowing the reader
to perceive something of the personality of the researchers;
however, the writing
is not dominated by their personalities. The editors and
researchers have clearly paid attention to organization,
making the studies
relatively easy
to read, even
for undergraduate students in music therapy (some quantitative
researchers could learn from this). Finally, the series provides
a publication
venue for larger
research studies, those which might not fit into the boundaries
that most research journals place on their publications.
Several
questions came up for me when reading QIMT. Perhaps the
biggest question
was one that many positivistic
researchers
might
have: "so what?" This
is a question that Ken Bruscia continually posed when I
was completing my dissertation under his advisement. It
is an especially important question
in qualitative
research. Behind it is the expectation that the researcher
present results (and other materials)
in such a way that the reader can make sense of it-essentially,
to be empathic with the reader. Each study in these first
two volumes answers this question
in its own way, and the reader is never wondering how the
results of a given study might apply to one's own work
as a music therapist. One criticism might
be that the studies focus too much on the experiences of
music therapists, rather than the experience of clients
or other more client-related phenomena.
Only one
study, in Volume 1, was client-centered (Gardstrom). Perhaps
future volumes will include more such studies.
QIMT
will not be published on a regular basis. Instead, it will
appear when adequate studies have been collected
to
fill a volume.
While
Volumes 1 & 2
appeared on an annual basis, we cannot assume this will
continue. However, given the quality
so far, I certainly hope to see new volumes on a semi-regular
basis, and encourage qualitative researchers in music
therapy to send in their submissions.
Qualitative
Inquiries in Music Therapy promises to be a valuable
resource to the field.
This
bookreview was released June 14, 2006. ©2006
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy